On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Stephen Allen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 04:53:29PM +0100, maderios wrote: >> On 11/04/2013 02:30 AM, dksill wrote: >> >I fully agree with the first post of this blog. the question whether to save >> >unsaved work spoils the whole efficiency to quickly edit a file. >> > >> Hi >> It's a "very old" story... *Four years ago* Gimp developer Martin >> Nordholts explained on his blog: >> "A lot of people over at GIMPUSERS.com want the old save and >> "export" mechanism back. The conclusion to draw from that is that >> they are not part of the user group we are targeting. We are not >> trying to make GIMP into an excellent JPEG touchup application, we >> are making GIMP into a high-end photo manipulation application where >> most of the work is done in XCF." >> http://www.chromecode.com/2009/09/reactions-on-gimp-270.html >> Therefore we, professional (or advanced users), are not "the user >> group (they) are targeting... Martin Nordholts forgot other image >> formats, better than jpeg because they are not destructive: png, >> tiff. These three formats are very used in professional world but >> Martin Nordholts an gimp team sadly ignore it... >> Greetings >> -- > > This subject has been worn out - Please stop it maderios! Professional image > editors don't work in jpeg format. It's an end use format. Think non > destructive > editing.
Maderios has already been unsubscribed for repetitive violation of the code of conduct. Alexandre _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
