On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:15 PM, J Albrecht wrote: > For the Developer’s benefit, I’d like to reiterate the above statement: > digiKam is a > brilliant program but please, let’s maintain the focus on where it is > brilliant rather > than trying to craft it into an all-singing-all-dancing piece of bloatware > comprising > relatively mediocre modules just for the sake of doing so. In the FOSS realm, > digikam is an excellent Digital Asset Management program, darktable is, IMHO, > the best Raw editor and GIMP is unparalleled for post-processing. It’s folly > and > perhaps a bit arrogant to assume that Users would willingly be hobbled by > using > only one program simply because they are “loyal” to that program.
..or you could politely ask whether having a switch for the preferable raw plug-in is planned for GIMP (hint: it is). Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
