I don't know what to tell you. :( I loaded your original image in McGimp (my Mac GIMP build) and then used the gegl command line with same parameters: rad = 300, samples = 4, iter = 10 and I got identical results.
$ date; gegl res_WLDF1130.jpg -o res_WLDF1130-GEGL-CLI.jpg -- c2g > radius=300 samples=4 iterations=10; date > Sat Feb 11 22:59:19 EST 2017 > EEEEeEeek! 1 GeglBuffers leaked > Sat Feb 11 22:59:21 EST 2017 On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 4:47 AM, waldauf <for...@gimpusers.com> wrote: > Hello, > > just small attempt to highlight this question... :] > > -- > waldauf (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > _______________________________________________ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
