* labaxp <for...@gimpusers.com> [05-17-18 16:30]: > >An interesting variable: > >- My first download was from the GIMP direct download site. > >- My second download of 2.10.0 was from a mirror site. > >Who knows? I think cleaning out remnants of 2.8 16 and putting 2.10.0 > >in a > >new folder did the trick. > > > >Rick S. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Rick Strong > >Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 3:00 PM > >To: wireless112 ; gimp-user-list@gnome.org > >Cc: notificati...@gimpusers.com > >Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow > > > >Not to dismiss your experience, mine is different: > > > >GIMP 2.10.0 opens in about 7~8 seconds (first opening of the day; > >subsequent > >openings are faster). > >The "Export As" dialogue opens in 4 sec. Ram usage is about 2.07 GB, > >26%. > >WIN 7 64 Pro, SP 1, 8GB RAM > > > >My initial install experience with 2.10.0 was bad. It opened *very* > >slowly > >and then wouldn't open at all. > >- I uninstalled 2.10.0. > >- I uninstalled 2.8.16 (which supposedly had been uninstalled or > >overwritten). > >- I installed 2.10 to **a brand new folder.** > >- It runs like a charm (so far). > > > >Might be worth a try. > > > >Rick S. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: wireless112 > >Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 9:53 PM > >To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > >Cc: notificati...@gimpusers.com > >Subject: [Gimp-user] Gimp 2.10 very slow > > > >Slow I think is too generous. I would say 486 about describes the > >performance. > >Win 10 64. TR 1950x, 32 GB RAM, 2 R7 370's. > > > >We're talking a minute waiting for export dialogs to finally become > >visible, > >and > >when they do a majority of the time they aren't on the foreground. You > >have > >to > >go hunting. > > > >I had 2.8 on my previous build, no problems whatsoever. My previous > >build > >was a > >FX8350 with 24GB of RAM. Same video. > > > >2.8 = Lamborghini Aventador SV > > > >2.10 = Ford Pinto > > > >That's with 8 GB more RAM, 8 more cores, and 16 additional threads. > >And a > >whole > >bunch of additional PCIe lanes. Source material on nvm's vs platters. > >I > >surely > >wasn't expecting this slow. I am going to reinstall 2.8 now. > > > >At this point I am just basically saying me too. Not expecting > >assistance on > >a > >work around, I'll try the next version when it comes out. > > > >Also 2.10 is a RAM pig. > > It is propably windows related issue and maybe hardware related as well. > I have tried gimp 2.1 on another pc (it was the first time gimp was installed > on > that pc) and the performance was terrible. I dont know what to say. All these > updates and improvements are worthless if its not stable. And they should > remove > this release from stable releases.
I am sure your expert evaluation of the most expensive product, gimp, will be well received. I am sorry your currency was ill spent. ps: are you in any way related to Mr. Edsel who also went the way of the dodo? -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo paka @ IRCnet freenode _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
