"pcg"@goof.com ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:04:32PM -0500, Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > I think spam filtering is basically an end-user problem. There is no way > > > to make lists spam-free, so "not large" seems fine to me. > > > > You can, by only permitting subscribers to post to the list, which many > > lists do these days.. > > Which I consider counter-productive. Forcing users to subscribe to a > mailinglist just to be able to post doesn'z seem right (for mayn, not all, > mailinglists).
It's a matter of opinion. I personally find dealing with the spam counter-productive. > > -- > -----==- | > ----==-- _ | > ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- > --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| > -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ > The choice of a GNU generation | > | -- Until later: Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "...the system (Microsoft passport) carries significant risks to users that are not made adequately clear in the technical documentation available." - David P. Kormann and Aviel D. Rubin, AT&T Labs - Research - http://www.avirubin.com/passport.html _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
