John R. Culleton wrote: > Not at all. I was noting that on two different flavors of linux > it is necessary to download and install material beyond that > contained in the Gimp download in order to get it to compile. And > that wasn't true in prior versions.
Um... you're kidding, right? GTK+ Glib libpng libjpeg gcc make ... are also required and not included. > Perhaps the missing module should be put in with the Gimp tarball > if that is legal and practical. Sorry, but after your previous statement I have troubles to take you serious. Maybe you could help to solve my confusion and tell me why you thinks this could ever be practical? HTH, Michael -- The GIMP > http://www.gimp.org | IRC: irc://irc.gimp.org/gimp Wiki > http://wiki.gimp.org | .de: http://gimpforum.de Plug-ins > http://registry.gimp.org | _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
