On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:37:55PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > "Alan Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just curious, is there a reason that PNG is a bad choice for this? > > > > Lossless compression seems like it'd be a great advantage and it isn't a fly > > by night file format. > > Does PNG support 16 bit per channel? If not then TIFF is probably the > better choice for those.
Yes, it does. I do medical diagnostic software, and we use the 16-bit
support of PNG every day.
Jeff
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Science is as much about computers as astronomy is about telescopes
-- Edsger Wybe Dijkstra (1930-2002)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
pgpmQnge0AMeu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
