Doug wrote:
> Konstantin Svist wrote:
>> Doug wrote:
>>
>>> <snip>
>>> Having tried out Liquid Rescale I'm very impressed. But does anyone
>>> have an idea about the size of image it can deal with in terms of
>>> memory requirements (I presume the Gimp setting Tile Cache size)?
>>>
>>> I've crashed it with a 700MB jpg setting Tile Cache Size to 3 GB
>>> (using Linux Mandriva 2007.0)
>>>
>>
>> There should be best/worst-case estimates in the paper, but if not,
>> it probably depends on the algorithm.
>> But 700MB jpeg... that's pretty hard core :)
>>
> Thanks, I'll go have a look at the paper.
> The jpeg was a mosaic of some 25 sensible-sized pics ;-)
>
> Doug
>
P.S. the paper is beyond me, but I couldn't recognise any sort of estimates.
Thanks anyway.
Doug
_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
