Hi, On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 16:53 -0500, Leonard Evens wrote:
> I'm not familiar with gimp code, so I don't understand what this means, > but I think I can probably figure it out. I will give it a try. In any case, > it would be even better for my purposes if I could specify where the corners > of the handles go and let gimp calculate the matrix for me and apply it. You can do that using gimp-drawable-transform-perspective. > By the way, I don't really understand what the purpose of showing the > matrix is if you can't change it directly. Its meaning is far > from transparent to a naive user, and even someone who is sophisticated > about the math, like me, would have to do some calculations to figure > out what the transformation will do given the matrix. It would be > more useful to know where the corners of the handles will go under > the transformation. But in the present situation, it is all I have, so > I don't propose removing it. But you can see where the handles will go as that is how you set up the transformation. I agree that it is not very useful to display the transformation matrix and perhaps this should just be removed. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
