> > I have been following this thread with interest so I decided to do some > > tests. The results may be relevant or not as the case may be but I think > > that they are interesting. My little camera gives a RAW image = 8.6 MB > > and a jpeg image = 2.6 MB. The developed RAW image from UFRaw saved at > > 98% jpeg = 17.2 MB > > What do you think are benefits of using jpegs with quality above 95%?
I have absolutely no idea, it is just that I came across a reference somewhere which said "I use 98% jpeg compression when archiving images. > > Better use compressed 8-bit sRGB TIFF instead (all minilabs I know > would reject TIFF with *any* compression, though...). Why is that? Norman _______________________________________________ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
