I prefer the original as well. Unless there's a compelling argument for changing it, I'll leave it as is. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:38 AM Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Pat David wrote: > > Referring to this bug report: > > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758510 > > > > Should I change the lead description text to just "The Free Software > Image > > Editor"? > > Aren't "software" and "editor" mutually exclusive in this case? > > Anyway, I don't see what's wrong with "The Free & Open Source Image > Editor". It uses the word "free", and the "open source" bit serves > nicely as an explanation what kind of free it is. > > If purists have a problem with that, I dare say they might go ahead > and create a free gnu whatever image editor of their own. Godspeed > with that. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > gimp-web-list mailing list > gimp-web-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-web-list mailing list gimp-web-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-web-list
