Hi Jakob,

NP, I'll take a look tomorrow.

Cheers,
Chris

On Feb 2, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:

> Are you +1ing the release, or just the idea of having a source release
> in general?
> 
> The vote ends tomorrow, so it would be great if the committers and
> mentors could take a look...
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Avery Ching <ach...@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1.
>> I'm fine with this.
>> 
>> Avery
>> 
>> 
>> On 1/31/12 8:45 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release.
>>> 
>>> As mentioned above, we're releasing a tag (a specific svn revision).
>>> That is what the release is.  Both src .tar.gz and binary files are
>>> courtesies.
>>> 
>>>> A release should be something that users can use as a dependency. . .like
>>>> a maven coordinate.
>>> 
>>> A source release in no way prevents us from creating jars of the
>>> release and adding them to Apache's maven repo.  In fact, we can't add
>>> a jar until we have a release.
>>> 
>>>> I think you guys should wait until you have made these decisions
>>> 
>>> If you would like to assist with moving away from the munging, there
>>> is an open JIRA to do so.  Any effort would be appreciated.
>>> 
>>>> To address the issues of binaries, could we release multiple binaries of
>>>> Giraph that coincide with the different versions of Hadoop?
>>> 
>>> Adding in external dependencies for a binary release (and even just
>>> for a source release with jars that couldn't be brought in via
>>> maven/sbt) caused significant delay recently for Kafka.  I'd like to
>>> avoid that here.  Also, since we intend to release early and often,
>>> there's no reason we can't follow up with a 0.2 in short order - there
>>> are going to be a lot of patches in the next few weeks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Avery Ching<ach...@apache.org>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> To address the issues of binaries, could we release multiple binaries of
>>>> Giraph that coincide with the different versions of Hadoop?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/31/12 7:44 PM, David Garcia wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think these concerns preclude the entire idea of a release.  A release
>>>>> should be something that users can use as a dependency. . .like a maven
>>>>> coordinate.  I think you guys should wait until you have made these
>>>>> decisions. . .and then cut a binary.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/31/12 5:36 PM, "Jakob Homan"<jgho...@gmail.com>    wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Giraphers-
>>>>>> I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source release
>>>>>> without a binary for two reasons: first, there's still discussion
>>>>>> going on about what needs to be done for the NOTICE and LICENSE files
>>>>>> for projects that bring in transitive dependencies to the binary
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> (http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg32693.html)
>>>>>> and second because we're still munging our binary against three types
>>>>>> of Hadoop, which would mean we'd need to release three different
>>>>>> binary artifacts, which seems suboptimal.  Hopefully both of these
>>>>>> issues will be addressed by 0.2.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've tested the release against an unsecure 20.2 cluster.  It'd be
>>>>>> great to test it against other configurations.  Note that we're voting
>>>>>> on the tag; the files are provided as a convenience.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/RELEASE_NOTE
>>>>>> S.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Release artifacts:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Corresponding svn tag:
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/tags/release-0.1-rc0/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Our signing keys (my key doesn't seem to be being picked up by
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc):
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/KEYS
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The vote runs for 72 hours, until Friday 4pm PST.  After a successful
>>>>>> vote here, Incubator will vote on the release as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jakob
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to