Gitweb:     
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=61b36fc1f7d511132b1dd1422c29c7a8f26d77db
Commit:     61b36fc1f7d511132b1dd1422c29c7a8f26d77db
Parent:     4ef110141b3e0758fe30d686417b5686b87eb25b
Author:     Andre Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AuthorDate: Tue Feb 19 10:06:15 2008 -0300
Committer:  Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CommitDate: Wed Feb 20 14:57:36 2008 +1100

    [POWERPC] cell: fix spurious false return from spu_trap_data_{map,seg}
    
    At present, the __spufs_trap_data_map and __spu_trap_data_seq functions
    exit if spu->flags has the SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_ACTIVE set. This was
    resulting in suprious returns from these functions, as they may be
    legitimately called when we have this bit set.
    
    We only use it in these two sanity checks, so this change removes the
    flag completely. This fixes hangs in the page-fault path of SPE apps.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andre Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c     |   12 ------------
 arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/switch.c |    6 +++---
 include/asm-powerpc/spu.h                  |    3 +--
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
index e45cfa8..87eb07f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spu_base.c
@@ -160,13 +160,6 @@ static int __spu_trap_data_seg(struct spu *spu, unsigned 
long ea)
 
        pr_debug("%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
 
-       if (test_bit(SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_ACTIVE, &spu->flags)) {
-               /* SLBs are pre-loaded for context switch, so
-                * we should never get here!
-                */
-               printk("%s: invalid access during switch!\n", __func__);
-               return 1;
-       }
        slb.esid = (ea & ESID_MASK) | SLB_ESID_V;
 
        switch(REGION_ID(ea)) {
@@ -226,11 +219,6 @@ static int __spu_trap_data_map(struct spu *spu, unsigned 
long ea, u64 dsisr)
                return 0;
        }
 
-       if (test_bit(SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_ACTIVE, &spu->flags)) {
-               printk("%s: invalid access during switch!\n", __func__);
-               return 1;
-       }
-
        spu->class_0_pending = 0;
        spu->dar = ea;
        spu->dsisr = dsisr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/switch.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/switch.c
index 6063c88..6f5886c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/switch.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/switch.c
@@ -720,8 +720,9 @@ static inline void set_switch_active(struct spu_state *csa, 
struct spu *spu)
         * Restore, Step 23.
         *     Change the software context switch pending flag
         *     to context switch active.
+        *
+        *     This implementation does not uses a switch active flag.
         */
-       set_bit(SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_ACTIVE, &spu->flags);
        clear_bit(SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_PENDING, &spu->flags);
        mb();
 }
@@ -1739,9 +1740,8 @@ static inline void reset_switch_active(struct spu_state 
*csa, struct spu *spu)
 {
        /* Restore, Step 74:
         *     Reset the "context switch active" flag.
+        *     Not performed by this implementation.
         */
-       clear_bit(SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_ACTIVE, &spu->flags);
-       mb();
 }
 
 static inline void reenable_interrupts(struct spu_state *csa, struct spu *spu)
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h b/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h
index f07c99b..e3c845b 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/spu.h
@@ -98,9 +98,8 @@
 #define MFC_PRIV_ATTN_EVENT                 0x00000800
 #define MFC_MULTI_SRC_EVENT                 0x00001000
 
-/* Flags indicating progress during context switch. */
+/* Flag indicating progress during context switch. */
 #define SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_PENDING     0UL
-#define SPU_CONTEXT_SWITCH_ACTIVE      1UL
 
 struct spu_context;
 struct spu_runqueue;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git-commits-head" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to