Well, that's the kind of pearls git contains and I still have to
discover.

Thanks.

On Sep 7, 4:45 am, David Aguilar <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/10, Mark Kharitonov <mark.kharito...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > @Rouleau: Thanks for the reply.
>
> >  Nope. I have two SVN repositories, where:
> >  - the first repository is the repository before the old VCS crashed.
> >  - the second repository contains all the dev code since the crash with
> >  the history starting from the crash day onwards.
>
> >  I wish to have a single GIT repository containing the merge of the two
> >  SVN repositories, so that the crash incident does not manifest itself
> >  in anyway. In other words, if a file is present in two SVN
> >  repositories, then it has two distinct histories - the one from its
> >  creation until the crash (in the first repo) and the other  - from the
> >  crash until now (in the new repo). I want this file to have a single
> >  history in the GIT, which is from its creation until now.
>
> You should read up on "grafts" in git.
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/161928/what-are-git-info-grafts-forhttps://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GraftPoint
>
> "Merge" in git parlance means something different then how you are
> using it, which may be part of the confusion.  Once you've grafted the
> histories together you should be able to filter-branch the graft point
> away.  The basic idea is to start from two separate git repositories.
> Go into the one with the post-crash history and graft the initial
> commit so that its parent is the last commit from the pre-crash
> history.  Once the graft is setup you can use filter-branch to make
> the graft permanent.
>
> In order to have the pre-crash history available in the post-crash
> repo you'll need to add it as a remote to your post-crash repo.
>
> git remote add old path/to/pre-crash
> git fetch old
>
> The pre-crash SHA1s will then become available from your post-crash
> repo.  'git branch -a' will show its branches, etc.
>
> >  On Sep 5, 6:31 pm, P Rouleau <proulea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  > I'm not an expert, but it looks like you now have two branches in SVN
> >  > and you want to merge them back, but in git instead. And the hardest
> >  > step will be "finding the time to do it"...
>
> >  > I understand you want to keep the pre-crash history and the post-crash
> >  > one too. I suggest these steps (look at the doc for the options'
> >  > description):
> >  > 1. git svn clone [-s] -A {authors.lst} svn://pre-crash-svn mergeCrash
> >  > 2. git svn clone [-s] -A {authors.lst} svn://post-crash-svn postCrash
> >  > 3. cd mergeCrash
> >  > 4. git remote add postCrash ../postCrash
> >  > 5. git fetch [--tags] postCrash master
> >  > 6. git merge postCrash/master
>
> I don't think this is what we are trying to accomplish.
>
>
>
> >  > On Sep 5, 3:42 am, Mark Kharitonov <mark.kharito...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  > > Dear ladies and sirs.
>
> >  > > We use SVN as our VCS, but wish to migrate to git. All is good, but a
> >  > > few months ago our SVN server had a serious RAID problems (so much
> >  > > that it became unusable) plus at the same day no IT person was
> >  > > available to restore the repository from the backups. So, we have
> >  > > setup a temporary SVN server on a certain workstation from the most
> >  > > recent version that we had. The net result is:
>
> >  > >    1. We have a few months of work on the temporary SVN server (the
> >  > > revisions there start from 1, of course)
> >  > >    2. There is a new VCS server machine with the pre-crash SVN
> >  > > repository restored there, but no one uses it yet, because someone has
> >  > > to merge the temporary repository there somehow and no one has the
> >  > > time.
> >  > >    3. In addition, we want to migrate to git, because SVN is just too
> >  > > much pain to work with - merges are killing us.
>
> >  > > Can anyone advice on the best process to end up with a git repository,
> >  > > which would contain the old SVN repository merged with the temporary
> >  > > one?
>
> >  > > BTW, the new VCS server is a linux machine.
>
> >  > > Thanks a lot in advance.
>
> --
>     David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To post to this group, send email to git-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/git-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to