Thank you Philip and Mark.

We are using Linux servers. We can't have local disk, as it is corporate 
setup. 
We have our project shares on build servers across LAN only

I have tried sparse checkout and other options but not much improvement on 
git status. 
git status -uno
git update-index --untracked-cache and git update-index --split-index


Thanks
Ravalika


On Sunday, November 27, 2016 at 9:23:35 PM UTC+5:30, Philip Oakley wrote:
>
> Hi Mark, Ravalika,
>  
> We need to distinguish between URL style network connections (push, pull, 
> fetch, clone) and mapped drive local area network LAN style network 
> connections.
>  
> Mark is right that git status does not do any URL network style checks. 
> However, depending on Ravalika's local setup (which may be corporate), it 
> is quite possible for the local drive that the repository is held on to 
> actually be across the LAN - I often have that at my work where there are 
> lots of project shares, and one is expected to hold project data (even 
> personal workings) on those project drives. 
>  
> Obviously(?) the network is then setup to respond quickly most of the 
> time, though occassional I see slow downs if others are saturating a (my) 
> network switch with some large file transfer, such that my file transfer 
> goes slowly. Some corporate setups are not as reponsive...
>  
> The other aspect is the number of files checked out that need to be stat'd 
> and the total size of the worktree. There are philiosophical differences 
> between Linux and Windows regarding what parts of the stat process should 
> trusted meaning that Windows is generally slower, so for a large number of 
> files, all stored via a network share, a process delay is quite possible.
>  
> In addition to Mark's advice, it is worth determining how the repository 
> storage is organised with regard to internal vs network share storage. (and 
> OS / Git versions)
>  
> Philip
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> *From:* Mark Waite <javascript:> 
> *To:* Git for human beings <javascript:> 
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 26, 2016 1:48 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [git-users] How to improve the Git status performance
>
> Based on the description in the git-status manual page 
> <https://git-scm.com/docs/git-status>, I don't think that it is 
> performing any network operations.  Changing the location of the server 
> should not affect the performance of the "git status" command. 
>
> The manual page notes that if you have a repository which includes many 
> files, you can improve the performance of "git status" by not reporting 
> untracked files ("git status -uno" or "git status --untracked-files=no"). 
>  The specific quote is
>
> Because it takes extra work to find untracked files in the filesystem, 
>> this mode may take some time in a large working tree. Consider enabling 
>> untracked cache and split index if supported (see git update-index 
>> --untracked-cache and git update-index --split-index), Otherwise you can 
>> use no to have git status return more quickly without showing untracked 
>> files.
>
>
> Other techniques which can improve the performance of "git status" include:
>
>    - Use a local file system on an SSD disc drive for the working 
>    directory rather than a rotating disc 
>    - Use a local file system for the working directory rather than a 
>    network mounted file system
>    - Reduce the number of files in the working directory by using a 
>    sparse checkout to only checkout the files which are relevant to your work
>
> Mark Waite
>
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 10:36:29 PM UTC-7, Ravalika wrote: 
>>
>> Thank you 
>>
>> I have tried setting server on the same machine still the git status 
>> takes more time 
>>
>> real    0m25.969s
>> user    0m10.293s
>> sys     0m5.270s
>>
>> And tried the below flags also
>> ignoreStat = true
>> fscache = true
>> preloadindex = true
>> untrackedCache = true
>>
>> Still the git status takes more time ?
>>
>> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 1:27:43 PM UTC+5:30, Philip Oakley 
>> wrote: 
>>>
>>> Git is a DVCS - the first D is the key feature of it's performance. 
>>>  
>>> Do have a rethink of the use of a centralised network file server for 
>>> the user repository. The network delays are killing you.
>>>  
>>> Step one: Decentralise.
>>> Step two: Distribute control.
>>> Step three: fun and profit (and speed!)
>>>  
>>> Old habits die hard.. Try and get away from them
>>>  
>>> Philip
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> *From:* Ravalika 
>>> *To:* Git for human beings 
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:56 AM
>>> *Subject:* [git-users] How to improve the Git status performance
>>>
>>> Hi All, 
>>>
>>> We are using git-2.10.2 version for version control.
>>> It is an centralized server and git status takes too long
>>>
>>> How to improve the performance of git status
>>>
>>> Git repo details:
>>>
>>> Size of the .git folder is 8.9MB
>>> Number of commits approx 53838  (git rev-list HEAD --count)
>>> Number of branches -  330  
>>> Number of files - 63883
>>> Working tree clone size is 4.3GB
>>>
>>> time git status shows
>>> real 0m23.673s
>>> user 0m9.432s
>>> sys 0m3.793s
>>>
>>> then after 5 mins
>>> real    0m4.864s
>>> user    0m1.417s
>>> sys     0m4.710s
>>>
>>> And I have experimented following ways but no significant change 
>>>
>>> -          -  Setting core.ignorestat to true
>>>
>>> -          -  Git gc &git clean
>>>
>>> -          -  Shallow clone – Reducing number of commits
>>>
>>> -          -  Clone only one branch 
>>>
>>>       - Git repacking - git repack -ad && git prune
>>>
>>> -     - Cold/warm cache 
>>>
>>> Could you please let me know, what are the other ways to improve the git 
>>> performance ?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Renuka
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Git for human beings" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to git-users+...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Git for human beings" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to git-users+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git 
for human beings" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to