Hey Mike, I just hit this very issue. While the suggested work-around is OK it's not ideal. What's the appropriate mechanism to request an enhancement? Code it myself? This seems like a major hole in managing changes to repos so seems like it should be handled somehow.
Thanks On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 4:04:26 PM UTC-6, Mike Lewis wrote: > > Is there any hook that fires when a > git reset > command is issued? The natural assumption would be the > post-rewrite > hook, since part of the history is being rewritten, but it does not, both > according to the official documentation and some experiments that I've run. > The hook doesn't necessarily have to be a reset-specific hook, I just need > something that fires when a reset is performed. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/2efc79b0-8a89-47d9-a54a-cf0db9441cc3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
