Thanks Philip. I have that mental model right. I get that bit, and for the most part, I can make basic updates and copy them to the server. I even incorporated my stating server as another remote where I would push to when something was ready for viewing but I didn't like the process and didn't think it fit the right process.
I think all I wanted to do was not have a whole commit dedicated to removing a few comments - it really was a part of the same commit - just after the fact... Yes, forcing it sounds like what I should be doing. >From my understanding, it updated and committed locally without any issue - it just refused to do the same to the server. In the grand scheme of things - it probably doesn't matter but from a cleanliness point of view, I'd prefer to not have to commit comment changes... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to git-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/0f85c399-ff94-4b92-a351-c16928e1541d%40googlegroups.com.
