On Wednesday, December 29, 2021 at 2:57:31 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:
> >>> "s" == skybuck2000 <[email protected]> writes: > > > Now this is something to my liking. > > A git system where each commit and each branch has it's own working tree > ?! > > Why don't you give subversion a try? Maybe you would be happier this way. > https://subversion.apache.org/ Written by Apache ? No thanks ?! Does it have log4j issues ! HAHA. GIT has cool branching future. I can't learn two systems, to much time... Subversion may be akward... Git I can get and understand... Git is the future maybe... it's still evolving. With GIT I can scape it's feature perhaps... GIT is open source... has big man behind it from linux or at least that magic dust. Who the F created subversion lol ? Github is git git git no subversion. What is the point still of subversion ? I need something that can do it all. This system I described may run into windows explorer limits. Good thing I mention this... what is the limit of windows 11 explorer when it comes to path length... something I am going to find out soon. Also is subversion open source ? Seeing apache I would guess yes... I simply never looked into subversion that much... I don't think it's worth it any more... it's superceeded by git. But if you disagreem then turn this discussion around and convince me somehow that subversion is better than git ! ;) Bye, Skybuck. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Git for human beings" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/git-users/7e4ebd4d-1960-4e4c-9526-d781b5d027e3n%40googlegroups.com.
