Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 09:24:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:49:11PM CEST, I got a letter
> > where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > > There's some trickiness for the history of commits thing for stopping at
> > > the point where you have everything, but also behaving appropriately if
> > > you try once, fail partway through, and then try again. It's on my queue
> > > of things to think about.
> >
> > Can't you just stop the recursion when you hit a commit you already
> > have?
>
> The problem is that, if you've fetched the final commit already, and then
> the server dies, and you try again later, you already have the last one,
> and so you think you've got everything.
Hmm, some kind of journaling? ;-)
> At this point, I also want to put off doing much further with recursion
> and commits until revision.h and such are sorted out.
Agreed.
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
