Ray Lee wrote:
I'm still not communicating well.
Give me a case where assuming it's a replace will do the wrong thing, for C code, where it's a variable or function name.
Ray
-
I think you are communicating fine, but not fully understanding darcs.
try this: initial patch creates hello.c #include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
printf("Hello world!\n");
return 0;
}second patch: replace ./hello.c [A-Za-z_0-9] world universe
third patch, for conceptual clarity, created in another repository that had seen the first patch, but not the second (adds function wide_world):
hunk ./hello.c 3
+void wide_world()
+{
+ printf("Hello wide world\n");
+}
+
hunk ./hello.c 11
+ wide_world();
}
If patch2 was a replace patch, then the result of running the combined 3 patch version would be:
Hello universe!
Hello wide universe
but if patch2 was a non-replace patch, then the result would be: Hello universe! Hello wide world
-Tupshin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
