On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:00:51 +0200 Petr Baudis wrote:

> Dear diary, on Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 07:05:11AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
[...]
> >     snap=git-snapshot-$(date +"%Y%m%d")
> >     git-tar-tree HEAD $snap | gzip -9 > $snap.tar.gz
> > 
> > which is even easier, and a hell of a lot more efficient.
> 
> To put my two cents too, Cogito has cg-export for this:
> 
>       cg-export tmp-dir
> 
> to export to a temporary directory and
> 
>       cg-export git-snapshot.tar.gz
> 
> to export to a gzipped tarball (it can also do .tar, .tgz and .tar.bz2).

However, cg-export is buggy - if you use the second argument
(cg-export DESTFILE TREE_ID), the resulting tar file is different
from what git-tar-tree produces for the same TREE_ID (unless that
TREE_ID actually points to a tree - but in practice a commit or even
tag ID is typically used).

The problem is in this line:

id=$(tree-id "$2")

This converts the passed commit or tag to the underlying tree, which
is then passed to git-tar-tree.  However, git-tar-tree can follow
such links itself, and, what's more important, it actually uses some
information from the passed commit (it writes the commit ID to the
tar file as an extended header, and sets timestamp of all archive
members to the time of the commit).  Therefore reducing the ID
passed to git-tar-tree to a plain tree ID is wrong - if a commit ID
is available, it should be used.

-- 
Sergey Vlasov

Attachment: pgp2wWm7AoStx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to