Hi, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> Or are we forced to run an 'integration' repo so that we work with a
> 'star' arrangement? I am actually trying to avoid needing a central
> repo if possible.
Personally, I like the idea of an integration repository. The main reason
is that it avoids duplicate work and shifting blame for broken software,
particularly if you have a test suite.
My workflow is "develop, test, check-in, pull-and-merge, test-if-merged,
push". That tends to yield a saner change history, and requires less work,
than doing it for every co-worker.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
"Fundamentalists are like the fir trees in German forests: they cannot
stand alone, and are only stable when crowded together, branches locked
with those of their brothers. That is why we must always fear them,
because they will always hate us for our individualism."
[Brent Yaciw, with inspirational regards to Jack M. Bickham]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
