On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
> I'm keen on keeping my 'merge & publish' step in a single repo that
> has all the 'team' branches. The person running this repo will
> probably actually code in separate repos, and merge in there too.
I would suggest against a person owning a "merge and publish". Instead,
just have a public repo that everybody involved to can push to - _they_
will need to merge before they push (since a push won't accept a unrelated
parent), but that way anybody can export their changes at any time,
exactly like with a central CVS repository.
> Right now I'm switching 'heads' (I'm getting used to cogito's use of
> 'branch' for 'remote head') using this quick'n'dirty bit of shell:
No, just do
git checkout <headname>
> but I want to prevent the action if the checkout is 'dirty'. Is there
> any way to check whether cg-diff thinks anything has changed?
If you use "git checkout" to switch branches, it will do that testing for
you. You can still _force_ a head switch with "git checkout -f".
Oh, and if a file was dirty that is the same in both heads, the
"dirtyness" follows you into the new head. If that isn't what you want,
then you need to add some logic like
if [ "$(git-diff-files)" != "" ]; then
echo "Current branch not clean" >&2
exit 1
fi
git checkout "$@"
or something.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
