On Sun, 28 Aug 2005, Jason Riedy wrote: > > I'm fine with requiring a limited C99 compiler. A > pedantic compiler will reject members with a length > of zero. 6.7.5.2 para1 requires a value greater than > zero for a constant array size. So the code now (with > [0] decls) is neither C89 nor C99.
But using "array[]" means that "sizeof()" no longer works, and then you have to use "offsetof()", which is a big pain. I think all relevant compilers end up accepting [0] (probably giving a warning, especially in some pedantic mode), since it's been how gcc users have been doing things for years (gcc was late to the [] syntax). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html