Brandon Casey <draf...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 10:44:07PM -0700, Brandon Casey wrote: >>> Anyone else? :) >> >> Sorry to gang up on you. :) > > Heh. :b > >> I still think your 2/2 is worth doing independently, though. It is silly >> that git-prune will not mention pruned objects without "-v", but will >> mention temporary files. They should be in the same category. > > As I mentioned in an earlier message, I think the original thinking > was that removing a temporary object should be an unusual occurrence > that indicates a failure of some sort, so you want to inform the user > who may want to investigate (of course the file's gone, so what's to > investigate). Removing a stale object file on the other hand is just > part of the normal operation. That is why the former is always > printed out and the latter only when -v is used.
That matches my understanding, modulo "may want to investigate" is probably more like "may want to be reminded of an earlier repack that was aborted". > That was the original thinking, but I don't think it matters very > much. Printing both using the same conditions seems valid. Yeah, I agree that it does not make much difference either way and both ways of thinking feel equally valid. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
