Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > Either Jeff's "refname $name's log goes to logs/graveyard/$name~" or > Michael's "append ~d to each directory component, append ~f to the > leaf component" that are already proposed will keep "one file per > name" property to allow us to open once and efficiently read the > file through. Why would we want to see an inferiour alternative > added to the discussion?
Note that there may be some "other" advantage I am not seeing in the "directory with timestamp in its name"; if it is a big enough advantage over what have already been proposed, then that would be a valid reason why we may want to see it as an alternative (and at that point, it is no longer inferior). That is the reason why I asked "How would that help us in what way?" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
