On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes:
>>
>>>  * "git grep" learned to use a non-standard pattern type by default if
>>>    a configuration variable tells it to.
>>
>> This addition makes
>>
>>     git grep -e "(integer|buffer)"
>>
>> work as expected, when grep.patternType is set to "extended".
>>
>> Should this
>>
>>     git log --grep="(integer|buffer)"
>>
>> also honor the same configuration variable?  If not, why not?
>>
>> One more thing.  Currently you can say
>>
>>     git log -E --grep="(integer|buffer)"
>>
>> to ask for the ERE.  Should we also support -P to ask for pcre?  If
>> not, why not?
>
> Answering to myself who has been in tying-loose-ends mode.
>
> My answers to these questions are both yes, and I have a neatly
> lined up series that begins with a small bugfix and then
> enhancement, but I do not think these do not deserve to in the
> upcoming release.  The topic came too late, and even the fix is
> for a bug that has been with us for a long time.

Yeah, I think that could be useful and consistent. I took a look at
the grep situation in the log command briefly when writing the
original patch but ended up leaving it as-is as for the time being due
to time constraints and the like. But yeah, that behaviour is
definitely desirable. I think any commands that work with grep should
probably follow suit, for that matter. (Are there others other than
log and grep itself...?)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to