Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes:
I agree with Peff about "comment on the voodoo upfront".
> +#define START_OF_FILE_BONUS 9
> +#define END_OF_FILE_BONUS 46
> +#define TOTAL_BLANK_WEIGHT 4
> +#define PRE_BLANK_WEIGHT 16
> +#define RELATIVE_INDENT_BONUS -1
> +#define RELATIVE_INDENT_HAS_BLANK_BONUS 15
> +#define RELATIVE_OUTDENT_BONUS -19
> +#define RELATIVE_OUTDENT_HAS_BLANK_BONUS 2
When I read up to here, I thought "Heh, isn't the opposite of INdent
DEdent?" and then saw this:
> +#define RELATIVE_DEDENT_BONUS -63
> +#define RELATIVE_DEDENT_HAS_BLANK_BONUS 50
It turns out that you mean by OUTdent a line that indents further
(if I am reading the code correctly). Is that obvious to everybody?
> + /* Bonuses based on the location of blank lines: */
> + bonus += TOTAL_BLANK_WEIGHT * total_blanks;
> + bonus += PRE_BLANK_WEIGHT * m->pre_blank;
This and ...
> + } else if (indent > m->pre_indent) {
> + /*
> + * The line is indented more than its predecessor. Score it
> based
> + * on the larger indent:
> + */
> + score = indent;
> + bonus += RELATIVE_INDENT_BONUS;
> + bonus += RELATIVE_INDENT_HAS_BLANK_BONUS * any_blanks;
> + } else if (indent < m->pre_indent) {
... this seems to be indented correctly even after getting quoted,
which in turn means most of the lines in the added code share
indent-with-non-tab badness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
