Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes: > However, besides the bogus performance argument I introduced that function > to allow packet writs to fail using the `gentle` parameter: > http://public-inbox.org/git/D116610C-F33A-43DA-A49D-0B33958822E5%40gmail.com/ > > Would you be OK if I introduce packet_write_gently() that returns `0` if the > write was OK and `-1` if it failed?
Yes, I agree with you that it would be a good thing to have a _gently() variant that lets the caller deal with possible error conditions itself instead of dying. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
