Jeff Hostetler <[email protected]> writes:
> /*
> + * Print branch information for porcelain v2 output. These lines
> + * are printed when the '--branch' parameter is given.
> + *
> + * # branch.oid <commit><eol>
> + * # branch.head <head><eol>
Just bikeshedding, but ...
> + if (!s->branch)
> + fprintf(s->fp, "# branch.head %s%c", "(unknown)", eol);
> + else {
> + if (!strcmp(s->branch, "HEAD")) {
> + fprintf(s->fp, "# branch.head %s%c", "(detached)", eol);
> +
> + if (state.rebase_in_progress ||
> state.rebase_interactive_in_progress)
> + branch_name = state.onto;
> + else if (state.detached_from)
> + branch_name = state.detached_from;
> + else
> + branch_name = "";
> + } else {
> + branch_name = NULL;
> + skip_prefix(s->branch, "refs/heads/", &branch_name);
> +
> + fprintf(s->fp, "# branch.head %s%c", branch_name, eol);
... given that we are showing branch name, perhaps "branch.name"
instead of "branch.head" is more appropriate?
I wondered if "# " prefix before these lines is useful, by the way,
and initially thought that the fact that these lines begin with
"branch." and not with the "1/2/u $key" sufficient clue for whoever
reads them, but the reader can tell which kind of record it is by
reading the first two characters of each line (i.e. if "# " that is
not the usual "change info for a single file"), so it is actually a
good idea.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
