On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > >> That seems like the most sensible place, as that is where we should >> cover the order of reading and precedence. Perhaps FILES should be >> renamed to SOURCES or something (though I do not recall if we are >> restricted to "usual" manpage section names or not). >> >> Arguably this is not about git-config the program at all, but the >> general concept of "configuration for git", because the precedence rules >> apply equally to all of the git programs that read config. > > True, but that argument leads us to say git(1) is the best place ;-) > > If the user wants to know "how does the configuration values get > read?", and wishes not having to go around fishing for the > information in multiple places (and I think that is a reasonable > thing to wish for), I think adding it to the FILES section of > git-config(1) is a better option than inventing a separate > gitconfig(7), which would still require the user to consult two > places.
Great, I sent a patch in a new thread. I hope I formatted it correctly; haven't sent a patch via email in a while. -- glas...@davidglasser.net | langtonlabs.org | flickr.com/photos/glasser/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
