>> +
>> + if (option_recursive) {
>> + if (option_required_reference.nr &&
>> + option_optional_reference.nr)
>> + die(_("clone --recursive is not compatible with "
>> + "both --reference and --reference-if-able"));
>
> So if you have multiple references that don't all match we basically
> just refuse to allow recursive?
>
> Would it be better to simply assume that we want to die on missing
> references instead of failing the clone here?
The new config options are per repo (or even set globally), and not
per alternate. And as we communicate the [if-able] part via the config
options to the submodules it is not feasible to transport both
kinds of (reference-or-die and reference-but-ignore-misses).
That is why I introduced this check in the first place. If we'd go back
to the drawing board and come up with a solution that is on a
"per alternate" basis we could allow such things.
> That is, treat it so
> that multiple reference and reference-if-able will die, and only info
> if we got only reference-if-able?
>
> Probably what's here is fine, and mixing reference and
> reference-if-able doesn't make much sense.
I think the reference-if-able doesn't make sense for one project alone
as you can easily script around that, but is only useful if you have
submodules in a partially checked out superproject that you want
to reference to.
Thanks,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
