Am 30.08.2016 um 19:52 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
Right, but that is exactly what I wanted to avoid, because it is rather
inelegant to strdup() strings just so that we do not have to record what
to free() and what not to free().
Please, excuse, but when I have to choose what is more "elegant":
1. strdup() sometimes so that I can later free() always
2. use sequencer_entrust()
I would choose 1. at all times.
Particularly in this case: parsing options does not sound like a major
drain of resources, neither CPU- nor memory-wise.
-- Hannes
