W dniu 03.09.2016 o 05:31, Stefan Beller pisze: > When moving code (e.g. a function is moved to another part of the file or > to a different file), the review process is different than reviewing new > code. When reviewing moved code we are only interested in the diff as > where there are differences in the moved code, e.g. namespace changes. > > However the inner part of these moved texts should not change. > To aid a developer reviewing such code, emit it with a different prefix > than the usual +,- to indicate it is overlapping code.
What would be this different prefix? Side note: I wonder if the cousin of unified diff, namely context diff[1], is something that we can and should support. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Context-Format.html https://www.gnu.org/software/diffutils/manual/html_node/Detailed-Context.html *** lao 2002-02-21 23:30:39.942229878 -0800 --- tzu 2002-02-21 23:30:50.442260588 -0800 *************** *** 1,7 **** - The Way that can be told of is not the eternal Way; - The name that can be named is not the eternal name. The Nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth; ! The Named is the mother of all things. Therefore let there always be non-being, so we may see their subtlety, And let there always be being, --- 1,6 ---- The Nameless is the origin of Heaven and Earth; ! The named is the mother of all things. ! Therefore let there always be non-being, so we may see their subtlety, And let there always be being, *************** *** 9,11 **** --- 8,13 ---- The two are the same, But after they are produced, they have different names. + They both may be called deep and profound. + Deeper and more profound, + The door of all subtleties!
