On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does this convince you to keep the proposed error handling? If yes, then > I would add a comment to the function to document that behavior explicitly! oops. I should read the docs more carefully. Thanks for pointing out. Then I'd be happy with the patch as is. Thanks, Stefan
