On 09/19/2016 07:27 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> writes: > >> Michael Haggerty <mhag...@alum.mit.edu> writes: >> >>> On 09/08/2016 01:25 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>>> I'd move it temporarily to t4061 with a separate SQUASH??? at the >>>> tip for now, as I am running out of time today. >>> >>> I didn't realize you were waiting for an ACK. Yes, it's totally OK to >>> rename the test. >> >> I actually wasn't asking for an Ack. >> >> As the issue was in the one that is buried a few commits from the >> tip, and there is a later one that adds more tests to it, I didn't >> find enough energy to rename the new file in a buried commit and >> then adjust the patch later updates it, I was hoping that you'd >> reroll to save me effort, rather than forcing me to do the rebase >> myself ;-). > > Now I did, so no need to resend (unless you have changes other than > the renaming of the test script, that is).
Thanks for taking care of this. > Let's move it down to 'next' soonish. Yes, it would be good to get feedback early enough in the cycle that we can make a final decision about which diff heuristics should be used by default and whether/what UI to implement for switching between them. Michael
