On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 03:17:23PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 08:54:40PM +0200, Kevin Daudt wrote:
> >
> >> + ...
> >> + while ((c = *in++) != 0) {
> >> + if (take_next_literally) {
> >> + take_next_literally = 0;
> >> + } else {
> >> [...]
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + strbuf_addch(line, c);
> >> + }
> >> +}
> >
> > It needs to `free(in)` at the end of the function.
>
> Ehh, in has been incremented and is pointing at the terminating NUL
> there, so it would be more like
>
> char *to_free, *in;
>
> to_free = strbuf_detach(line, NULL);
> in = to_free;
> ...
> while ((c = *in++)) {
> ...
> }
> free(to_free);
>
> I would think ;-).
Oops, yes. It is beginning to make the "strbuf_swap()" look less
convoluted. :)
-Peff
