On Fri, Sep 23, 2016, at 03:15 PM, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 23.09.2016 o 11:08, Ian Kelling napisał:
>
> > The "highlight" binary can, in some cases, determine the language type
> > by the means of file contents, for example the shebang in the first line
> > for some scripting languages. Make use of this autodetection for files
> > which syntax is not known by gitweb. In that case, pass the blob
> > contents to "highlight --force"; the parameter is needed to make it
> > always generate HTML output (which includes HTML-escaping).
>
> Right.
>
> >
> > Although we now run highlight on files which do not end up highlighted,
> > performance is virtually unaffected because when we call highlight, we
> > also call sanitize() instead of esc_html(), which is significantly
> > slower.
>
> This paragraph is a bit unclear, for example it is not obvious what
> "..., which is significantly slower" refers to: sanitize() or esc_html().
>
> I think it would be better to write:
>
> Although we now run highlight on files which do not end up highlighted,
> performance is virtually unaffected because when we call highlight, it
> is used for escaping HTML. In the case that highlight is used, gitweb
> calls sanitize() instead of esc_html(), and the latter is significantly
> slower (it does more, being roughly a superset of sanitize()).
Agree. Done in v4.
>
> > After curling blob view of unhighlighted large and small text
> > files of perl code and license text 100 times each on a local
> > Apache/2.4.23 (Debian) instance, it's logs indicate +-1% difference in
> > request time for all file types.
>
> Also, "curling" is not the word I would like to see. I would say:
>
> Simple benchmark comparing performance of 'blob' view of files without
> syntax highlighting in gitweb before and after this change indicates
> ±1% difference in request time for all file types. Benchmark was
> performed on local instance on Debian, using Apache/2.4.23 web server
> and CGI/PSGI/FCGI/mod_perl.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^--- select one
>
> Or something like that; I'm not sure how detailed this should be.
> But it is nice to have such benchmark in the commit message.
Sounds good. Used it in v4.
>
> Anyway I think that adding yet another configuration toggle for selecting
> whether to use "highlight" syntax autodetection or not would be just an
> unnecessary complication.
>
> Note that the performance loss might be quite higher on MS Windows, with
> its higher cost of fork. But then they probably do not configure
> server-side highligher anyway.
>
> >
> > Document the feature and improve syntax highlight documentation, add
> > test to ensure gitweb doesn't crash when language detection is used.
>
> Good.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Kelling <i...@iankelling.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
> > gitweb/gitweb.perl | 10 +++++-----
> > t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh | 8 ++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt b/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt
> > index a79e350..e632089 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt
> > @@ -246,13 +246,20 @@ $highlight_bin::
>
> We should probably say what does it mean to be "highlight"[1] compatible,
> but it is outside of scope for this patch, and I think also out of scope
> of this series.
>
> > Note that 'highlight' feature must be set for gitweb to actually
> > use syntax highlighting.
> > +
> > -*NOTE*: if you want to add support for new file type (supported by
> > -"highlight" but not used by gitweb), you need to modify `%highlight_ext`
> > -or `%highlight_basename`, depending on whether you detect type of file
> > -based on extension (for example "sh") or on its basename (for example
> > -"Makefile"). The keys of these hashes are extension and basename,
> > -respectively, and value for given key is name of syntax to be passed via
> > -`--syntax <syntax>` to highlighter.
> > +*NOTE*: for a file to be highlighted, its syntax type must be detected
> > +and that syntax must be supported by "highlight". The default syntax
> > +detection is minimal, and there are many supported syntax types with no
> > +detection by default. There are three options for adding syntax
> > +detection. The first and second priority are `%highlight_basename` and
> > +`%highlight_ext`, which detect based on basename (the full filename, for
> > +example "Makefile") and extension (for example "sh"). The keys of these
> > +hashes are the basename and extension, respectively, and the value for a
> > +given key is the name of the syntax to be passed via `--syntax <syntax>`
> > +to "highlight". The last priority is the "highlight" configuration of
> > +`Shebang` regular expressions to detect the language based on the first
> > +line in the file, (for example, matching the line "#!/bin/bash"). See
> > +the highlight documentation and the default config at
> > +/etc/highlight/filetypes.conf for more details.
>
> All right. I guess /etc/highlight/filetypes.conf is the standard
> location?
I think so. I checked packages from homebrew, fedora, suse, debian to
confirm.
>
> > +
> > For example if repositories you are hosting use "phtml" extension for
> > PHP files, and you want to have correct syntax-highlighting for those
> > diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> > index 6cb4280..44094f4 100755
> > --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> > +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
> > @@ -3931,15 +3931,16 @@ sub guess_file_syntax {
> > # or return original FD if no highlighting
> > sub run_highlighter {
> > my ($fd, $highlight, $syntax) = @_;
> > - return $fd unless ($highlight && defined $syntax);
> > + return $fd unless ($highlight);
> >
> > close $fd;
> > + my $syntax_arg = (defined $syntax) ? "--syntax $syntax" : "--force";
> > open $fd, quote_command(git_cmd(), "cat-file", "blob", $hash)." | ".
> > quote_command($^X, '-CO', '-MEncode=decode,FB_DEFAULT',
> > '-pse',
> > '$_ = decode($fe, $_, FB_DEFAULT) if !utf8::decode($_);',
> > '--', "-fe=$fallback_encoding")." | ".
> > quote_command($highlight_bin).
> > - " --replace-tabs=8 --fragment --syntax $syntax |"
> > + " --replace-tabs=8 --fragment $syntax_arg |"
> > or die_error(500, "Couldn't open file or run syntax
> > highlighter");
> > return $fd;
> > }
>
> All right, nice and understandable.
>
> > @@ -7063,8 +7064,7 @@ sub git_blob {
> >
> > my $highlight = gitweb_check_feature('highlight');
> > my $syntax = guess_file_syntax($highlight, $file_name);
> > - $fd = run_highlighter($fd, $highlight, $syntax)
> > - if $syntax;
> > + $fd = run_highlighter($fd, $highlight, $syntax);
> >
> > git_header_html(undef, $expires);
> > my $formats_nav = '';
>
> Good, run unconditionally.
>
> > @@ -7117,7 +7117,7 @@ sub git_blob {
> > $line = untabify($line);
> > printf qq!<div class="pre"><a id="l%i" href="%s#l%i"
> > class="linenr">%4i</a> %s</div>\n!,
> > $nr, esc_attr(href(-replay => 1)), $nr, $nr,
> > - $syntax ? sanitize($line) : esc_html($line,
> > -nbsp=>1);
> > + $highlight ? sanitize($line) : esc_html($line,
> > -nbsp=>1);
> > }
>
> Good, use highlighter if possible, not only if syntax is known
> and highlighter is turned on.
>
> Nice and easy to understand after earlier change.
>
> > }
> > close $fd
> > diff --git a/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
> > b/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
> > index e94b2f1..6d06ed9 100755
> > --- a/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
> > +++ b/t/t9500-gitweb-standalone-no-errors.sh
> > @@ -709,6 +709,14 @@ test_expect_success HIGHLIGHT \
> > git commit -m "Add test.sh" &&
> > gitweb_run "p=.git;a=blob;f=test.sh"'
> >
> > +test_expect_success HIGHLIGHT \
> > + 'syntax highlighting (highlighter language autodetection)' \
> > + 'git config gitweb.highlight yes &&
> > + echo "#!/usr/bin/perl" > test &&
> > + git add test &&
> > + git commit -m "Add test" &&
> > + gitweb_run "p=.git;a=blob;f=test"'
>
> Nice.
>
> > +
> > # ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > # forks of projects
> >
> >
>
Thanks for great suggestions.
