Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: >> >> We already have options to support these kinds of workflows. Look at the >> option '--remote' for 'git submodule update'. >> >> You then only have to commit the submodule if you do not want to see it >> as dirty locally, but you will always get the tip of a remote tracking >> branch when updating. > > I wonder if we could make that convenient for users by not tracking > the submodule, > i.e. > * we have the information in the .gitmodules file > * the path itself is in the .gitignore > * no tree entry > > Then you can update to the remote latest branch, without Git reporting > a dirty submodule locally, in fact it reports nothing for the submodule. > > It sounds like a hack, but maybe it's worth looking into that when > people want to see that workflow.
It IS a hack. But if you do not touch .git<anything> file and instead say "clone this other project at that path yourself" in README, that would probably be sufficient.
