Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Actually, I like that a bit better. It would not cover the case where > you have not actually checked out any of the submodules (or at least not > called "submodule init", I guess?). But arguably that is a sign that the > auto-recurse behavior should not be kicking in anyway.
Yeah, the "no init, no recursion" line of thought is very sensible. I like it.
