On 2016-10-11 22:36, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Thanks for a review. I'll wait until one of (1) a squashable patch > to address the "we do not want unconditional overwrite" issue, (2) a > reroll from Mantas to do the same, or (3) a counter-argument from > somebody to explain why unconditional overwrite is a good idea here > (but not in the original) appears.
I overlooked that. I can write a patch, but it shouldn't make any difference in practice – if c->username *was* set, then it would also get added to the search attribute list, therefore the search couldn't possibly return any results with a different username anyway. -- Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com>
