Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> writes:
> If I were doing this, I would make this into three separate steps:
>
> - move the strbuf_release(msgbuf) to the caller in
> do_pick_commit();
>
> - add the missing rollback_lock_file(), which is a bugfix; and
> then finally
>
> - allow the helper to take not a strbuf but <buf, len> pair as
> parameters.
>
> The end result of this patch achieves two thirds of the above, but
> especially given that write_message() only has two call sites in a
> single function, I think it is OK and preferrable even to do all
> three.
Ah, make that four steps. The final one is:
- add append_eol parameter that nobody uses at this step in the
series.
This is a new feature to the helper. While it is OK to have it as a
preparatory step in this series, it is easier to understand if it
kept as a separate step. It is even more preferrable if it is made
as a preparatory step in a series that adds a caller that passes
true to append_eol to this helper, or if that real change is small
enough, part of that patch that adds such a caller, not as a
separate step.
