Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> writes: > Am 28.10.2016 um 22:29 schrieb Junio C Hamano: >> Johannes Sixt <j...@kdbg.org> writes: >> >>> Another problem with the proposed patch is that there is no >>> declaration for attr_start() before the call in compat/mingw.c. We >>> would have to move the declaration of attr_start() to cache.h (for >>> example), because #including attr.h in compat/mingw.c is plainly >>> wrong. However, it would not be a major offense to #include attr.h in >>> common-main.c. But when we do that, we can certainly spare the few >>> cycles to call pthread_mutex_init. >> >> That sounds like a good argument to have it in common-main.c. >> >> Would it mean that the code that defines the mutex needs to have >> #ifdef that defines a no-op attr_start() and defines the mutex with >> PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITILIZER with #else that just defines the mutex >> without initializatin, with the real attr_start(), though? > > No. My intent was to call pthread_mutex_init for all platforms.
Ah, OK, so there was no magic plan. That's OK.
