Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: >> Probably this needs to be squashed in, now the MinGW discussion has >> settled. > > I was about to propose this (and resend it non-rebased). > > So I do not resend, but rather ask you to squash this patch?
That's OK. I've queued a "SQUASH???" separately for now and if we need futher changes, you may want to resend, but I can locally squash before merging it down to 'next' if it turns out that there is no more changes necessary. Thanks.
