On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Jacob Keller <jacob.kel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> wrote: >> From: Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> > > What's the reasoning for using separate functions here if they are > exactly identical except for name? Do we intend to add separate > options for this? I don't really have a problem with separate > functions here since it helps avoid confusion but they are identical > otherwise... >
I see no need to have separate functions. Maybe in the future when we plan on adding specific options we could split them. I'll drop the symref_atom_parser() function and use refname_atom_parser() both places. -- Regards, Karthik Nayak
