Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Actually, I take it back. I think it works for a single round of ref > negotiation, but not for multiple. Enabling GIT_TEST_LONG=1 causes it to > fail t5551. > > I think I've probably made a mis-assumption on exactly when in the HTTP > protocol we will see a flush packet (and perhaps that is a sign that > this protocol-snooping approach is not a good one).
Hmph. I think I tried David's original under GIT_TEST_LONG and saw it got stuck; could be the same issue, I guess.
