Hi Pranit,
On 10/14/2016 04:14 PM, Pranit Bauva wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> index 3f19b68..c6c11e3 100644
> --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static const char * const git_bisect_helper_usage[] = {
> N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-clean-state"),
> N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-reset [<commit>]"),
> N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-write <state> <revision> <TERM_GOOD>
> <TERM_BAD> [<nolog>]"),
> + N_("git bisect--helper --bisect-check-and-set-terms <command>
> <TERM_GOOD> <TERM_BAD>"),
Here's the same as in the previous patch... I'd not use
TERM_GOOD/TERM_BAD in capitals.
> NULL
> };
>
> @@ -212,6 +213,38 @@ static int bisect_write(const char *state, const char
> *rev,
> return retval;
> }
>
> +static int set_terms(struct bisect_terms *terms, const char *bad,
> + const char *good)
> +{
> + terms->term_good = xstrdup(good);
> + terms->term_bad = xstrdup(bad);
> + return write_terms(terms->term_bad, terms->term_good);
At this stage of the patch series I am wondering why you are setting
"terms" here, but I guess you'll need it later.
However, you are leaking memory here. Something like
free(terms->term_good);
free(terms->term_bad);
terms->term_good = xstrdup(good);
terms->term_bad = xstrdup(bad);
should be safe (because you've always used xstrdup() for the terms
members before). Or am I overseeing something?
> @@ -278,6 +314,13 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv,
> const char *prefix)
> terms.term_bad = xstrdup(argv[3]);
> res = bisect_write(argv[0], argv[1], &terms, nolog);
> break;
> + case CHECK_AND_SET_TERMS:
> + if (argc != 3)
> + die(_("--check-and-set-terms requires 3 arguments"));
> + terms.term_good = xstrdup(argv[1]);
> + terms.term_bad = xstrdup(argv[2]);
> + res = check_and_set_terms(&terms, argv[0]);
> + break;
Ha! When I reviewed the last patch, I asked you why you changed the code
from returning directly from each subcommand to setting res; break; and
then return res at the bottom of the function.
Now I see why this was useful. The two members of "terms" are again
leaking memory: you are allocating memory by using xstrdup() but you are
not freeing it.
(That also applies to the last patch.)
Cheers,
Stephan
