Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes: > Git interpret-trailers will not recognize this as a trailer block > because it doesn't have any standard git tags within it. Would it be ok > to augment the trailer interpretation to say that if we have over 75% > trailers in the block that we accept it even if it doesn't have any real > recognized tags?
I thought the documented way to do this is to configure one of your custom trailer as such. Jonathan? > pretty: add %bT format for displaying trailers of a commit message Are %(...) taken already? In longer term, it would be nice if we can unify the --pretty formats and for-each-ref formats, so it is probably better if we avoid adding any new short ones to the former. We have %s and %b so that we can reconstruct the whole thing by using both. It is unclear how %bT fits in this picture. I wonder if we also need another placeholder that expands to the body of the message without the trailer---otherwise the whole set would become incoherent, no?
