On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Jakub Narębski <jna...@gmail.com> wrote:
> W dniu 08.11.2016 o 21:12, Karthik Nayak pisze:
>> From: Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com>
>>
>> Since there are multiple atoms which print refs ('%(refname)',
>> '%(symref)', '%(push)', '%upstream'), it makes sense to have a common
>
> Minor typo; it should be: "%(upstream)"
>
Will fix that.
>> ground for parsing them. This would allow us to share implementations of
>> the atom modifiers between these atoms.
>>
>> Introduce refname_atom_parser_internal() to act as a common parsing
>> function for ref printing atoms. This would eventually be used to
>> introduce refname_atom_parser() and symref_atom_parser() and also be
>> internally used in remote_ref_atom_parser().
>>
>> Helped-by: Jeff King <p...@peff.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>
>> +static void refname_atom_parser_internal(struct refname_atom *atom,
>> + const char *arg, const char *name)
>> +{
>> + if (!arg)
>> + atom->option = R_NORMAL;
>> + else if (!strcmp(arg, "short"))
>> + atom->option = R_SHORT;
>> + else if (skip_prefix(arg, "strip=", &arg)) {
>> + atom->option = R_STRIP;
>> + if (strtoul_ui(arg, 10, &atom->strip) || atom->strip <= 0)
>> + die(_("positive value expected refname:strip=%s"),
>> arg);
>> + } else
> ^^^^^^
>
> It looks like you have spurious tab here.
>
That would have gone unnoticed, thanks for pointing it out.
--
Regards,
Karthik Nayak
