On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote: > Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: > >> We could have lstrip and rstrip as you suggested and perhaps make it work >> together too. But I see this going off the scope of this series. Maybe >> I'll follow up >> with another series introducing these features. Since we can currently >> make do with >> 'strip=2' I'll drop this patch from v8 of this series and pursue this >> idea after this. > > My primary point was that if we know we want to add "rstrip" later > and still decide not to add it right now, it is OK, but we will > regret it if we named the one we are going to add right now "strip". > That will mean that future users, when "rstrip" is introduced, will > end up having to choose between "strip" and "rstrip" (as opposed to > "lstrip" and "rstrip"), wondering why left-variant is more important > and named without left/right prefix. >
That's a good point actually, I'll try and implement both and re-roll. -- Regards, Karthik Nayak
